Prediction of Amelie Mauresmo vs Marissa Gould Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Mauresmo vs M. Gould

Amelie Mauresmo

FRA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.75m

Height

1.70m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$37.8K

Right-handed (one-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Marissa Gould

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.75m

Height

1.70m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$37.8K

Right-handed (one-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Mauresmo 2 - 0 Gould

They have played 5 sets in total, with Amelie Mauresmo winning 4 and Marissa Gould winning 1. The last match between Amelie Mauresmo and Marissa Gould was at the U.S. Open - New York, 30-08-2004, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Amelie Mauresmo getting the victory 6-4 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mauresmo	2
Gould	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) U.S. Open - New York(08-30-04)

Stats

Amelie Mauresmo

Marissa Gould

(R2) Family Circle Cup - Charleston, South Carolina(04-16-01)

Stats

Amelie Mauresmo

Marissa Gould

A. Mauresmo vs M. Gould H2H Profile

A. Mauresmo	Stats	M. Gould
$3,652,010	Career Prize Money	$37,835
70.87% (511-210)	Career Total W/L	52.99% (142-126)
1	Clay	0
1	Hard	0
26	Titles	4
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Mauresmo vs M. Gould Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Amelie Mauresmo has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marissa Gould has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Amelie Mauresmo, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marissa Gould has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Amelie Mauresmo has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marissa Gould has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Amelie Mauresmo has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marissa Gould winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Amelie Mauresmo has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 99/34), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 1/1). Marissa Gould has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 97/71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 5/15).
Player level: In the last year, Amelie Mauresmo has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marissa Gould has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Amelie Mauresmo winning 2 times and Marissa Gould being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Amelie Mauresmo winning 4 and Marissa Gould winning 1.
The last match between Amelie Mauresmo and Marissa Gould was at the U.S. Open - New York, 30-08-2004, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Amelie Mauresmo getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Amelie Mauresmo has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marissa Gould has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Amelie Mauresmo has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marissa Gould has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Amelie Mauresmo has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marissa Gould has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Amelie Mauresmo vs Marissa Gould Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Mauresmo vs M. Gould H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Mauresmo	Stats	M. Gould
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	1
27	Games Won	17
7	Aces (Total)	1
4	Total Double Faults	1
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
48% (31/64)	1st Serve %	60% (29/48)
77% (24/31)	1st Serve Win %	59% (17/29)
52% (17/33)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (9/19)
100% (4/4)	Break Pts Won %	20% (1/5)
46% (22/48)	Return Points Win %	36% (23/64)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Mauresmo Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - New York - 31-08-2009
R2 Aleksandra WozniakA. Wozniak	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
R1 Tatjana MariaT. Maria	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Pilot Pen Tennis presented by Schick - New Haven - 24-08-2009
SF Elena VesninaE. Vesnina	L	5-7 6-1 6-2	Stats
QF Svetlana KuznetsovaS. Kuznetsova	W	7-6(9) 2-6 6-3	Stats
R2 Alona BondarenkoA. Bondarenko	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

M. Gould Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - New York - 29-08-2005
R1 Aiko NakamuraA. Nakamura	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
JP Morgan Chase Open - Los Angeles - 08-08-2005
R1 Maria KirilenkoM. Kirilenko	L	4-6 7-5 6-2	Stats
Acura Classic - San Diego - 01-08-2005
R1 Flavia PennettaF. Pennetta	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Q3 Hana SromovaH. Sromova	L	7-5 3-6 6-2	Stats
Q1 Elizabeth KaufmanE. Kaufman	W	6-0 6-0	Stats

View All

A. Mauresmo vs M. Gould Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Mauresmo	Stats	M. Gould
70.87% (511/210)	YTD Win/Loss	52.99% (142/126)
66.51% (1102/555)	Sets Win/Loss	52.15% (328/301)
56.53% (8655/6655)	Games Win/Loss	50.78% (2964/2873)
71.06% (194/79)	Hard Win/Loss	57.74% (97/71)
71.36% (142/57)	Clay Win/Loss	56.45% (35/27)
70.95% (127/52)	Indoor Hard W/L	22.73% (5/17)
69.12% (47/21)	Grass Win/Loss	31.25% (5/11)
0.1	Aces Per Game	0.02
780	Aces Total	49
0.14	Double Faults Per Game	0.03
1029	Total Double Faults	72
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
359.09	Average Opponent Rank	436.68
62% (9928/16131)	1st Serve %	61% (940/1546)
68% (6727/9893)	1st Serve Win %	59% (552/940)
46% (2858/6199)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (269/627)
48% (985/2039)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (72/151)
46% (7217/15568)	Return Points Win %	43% (633/1467)
75.71% (134/43)	Slam W/L	41.03% (16/23)
70.12% (115/49)	Masters W/L	54.35% (25/21)
76.92% (30/9)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
70.47% (210/88)	Main Tour W/L	46.96% (54/61)
51.85% (14/13)	Challenger W/L	69.12% (47/21)
50.00% (1/1)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
71% (500/703)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (139/265)
100% (5/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
58% (97/167)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (38/73)
62% (138/223)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (47/94)
88% (479/423)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (137/115)
12% (479/56)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (137/22)
37% (242/89)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (131/26)